<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chuck&#039;s Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog</link>
	<description>Some Random Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CALug Feb 11 Feat. Riddell and Kirby by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/02/05/calug-feb-11-feat-riddell-and-kirby/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=181#comment-561</guid>
		<description>At this point I have to suggest you take it up with Jonathan himself. 

The way I read the post you refer to it sounds like that the people in question started the uploads and the core of the idea for Kubuntu and of the KDE packages. Jonathan&#039;s role may have come later. I don&#039;t know what his role was. However I&#039;d be surprised if he&#039;s making a claim like this without there being something to substantiate the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I have to suggest you take it up with Jonathan himself. </p>
<p>The way I read the post you refer to it sounds like that the people in question started the uploads and the core of the idea for Kubuntu and of the KDE packages. Jonathan&#8217;s role may have come later. I don&#8217;t know what his role was. However I&#8217;d be surprised if he&#8217;s making a claim like this without there being something to substantiate the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CALug Feb 11 Feat. Riddell and Kirby by shermann</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/02/05/calug-feb-11-feat-riddell-and-kirby/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>shermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=181#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Find it here:
Quote: 
More discussions about the project to build a KDE version of Ubuntu, called
Kubuntu, went on in MatarÃ³. There&#039;s not a lot to report yet but it&#039;s being
driven by Chris Halls and Andreas Mueller who are both new Ubuntu developers
and have experience with KDE work in Debian.

Found at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news/2005-January/000014.html

Regards,

\sh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Find it here:<br />
Quote:<br />
More discussions about the project to build a KDE version of Ubuntu, called<br />
Kubuntu, went on in MatarÃ³. There&#8217;s not a lot to report yet but it&#8217;s being<br />
driven by Chris Halls and Andreas Mueller who are both new Ubuntu developers<br />
and have experience with KDE work in Debian.</p>
<p>Found at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news/2005-January/000014.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news/2005-January/000014.html</a></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>\sh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CALug Feb 11 Feat. Riddell and Kirby by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/02/05/calug-feb-11-feat-riddell-and-kirby/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=181#comment-558</guid>
		<description>That was the information Jonathan sent me. 

I have no reason to doubt it unless you can provide me with some references.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the information Jonathan sent me. </p>
<p>I have no reason to doubt it unless you can provide me with some references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CALug Feb 11 Feat. Riddell and Kirby by shermann</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/02/05/calug-feb-11-feat-riddell-and-kirby/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>shermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=181#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Hmmm..

as long history goes, Kubuntu was invented by Chris Halls and Andreas Mueller...

AFAIK,

\sh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm..</p>
<p>as long history goes, Kubuntu was invented by Chris Halls and Andreas Mueller&#8230;</p>
<p>AFAIK,</p>
<p>\sh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Sebastian Thürrschmi</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Thürrschmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-546</guid>
		<description>people who say ‘you broke my internet/browser’

Come one, GNU/Linux is not Windows, Ubuntu is not Microsoft (only getting there, veeery slowly ;)), and Firefox is not IE! The average Ubuntu user is much, much smarter than that. Maybe she&#039;ll be slightly irritated when first searching the web after upgrading to Lucid, but for no longer than the few seconds it takes to change the default back to the right search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people who say ‘you broke my internet/browser’</p>
<p>Come one, GNU/Linux is not Windows, Ubuntu is not Microsoft (only getting there, veeery slowly <img src='http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), and Firefox is not IE! The average Ubuntu user is much, much smarter than that. Maybe she&#8217;ll be slightly irritated when first searching the web after upgrading to Lucid, but for no longer than the few seconds it takes to change the default back to the right search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Fabian</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Hmm, so you guess the deal is only one sided for Ubuntu? Really nobel from Microsoft.

But what if Ubuntu makes 1 cent per search through Yahoo/Bing but at the same time Microsoft makes 2 cents due to the delivered advertisement?

Whom do you help more Ubuntu or Micrsoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, so you guess the deal is only one sided for Ubuntu? Really nobel from Microsoft.</p>
<p>But what if Ubuntu makes 1 cent per search through Yahoo/Bing but at the same time Microsoft makes 2 cents due to the delivered advertisement?</p>
<p>Whom do you help more Ubuntu or Micrsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Stephen Michael Kellat</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Michael Kellat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-544</guid>
		<description>In light of Google possibly abandoning the Chinese market while Yahoo! is staying put, would this not instead be considered an inclusive measure?  Staying with using Google in this instance does not make this human-friendly computing as it instead singles out an national grouping for exclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of Google possibly abandoning the Chinese market while Yahoo! is staying put, would this not instead be considered an inclusive measure?  Staying with using Google in this instance does not make this human-friendly computing as it instead singles out an national grouping for exclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-543</guid>
		<description>My issue is not Canonical finding ways to profit. My issue is the lack of choice on the upgrade from the previous default. 

Defaults tend to be popular choices. Many people choose google as their search not only because it is the default option. Those people will be affected due to this change.

On a fresh install the change is not a big deal. A different default for a new version. On an upgrade the user&#039;s choices should be respected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issue is not Canonical finding ways to profit. My issue is the lack of choice on the upgrade from the previous default. </p>
<p>Defaults tend to be popular choices. Many people choose google as their search not only because it is the default option. Those people will be affected due to this change.</p>
<p>On a fresh install the change is not a big deal. A different default for a new version. On an upgrade the user&#8217;s choices should be respected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-542</guid>
		<description>As you say, it is two clicks to change it after annoying the end user.

With my suggestion it is one click, explains to the user why one selection would help the Ubuntu project and allow the user to make a choice. For those that don&#039;t care about the particular search engine they&#039;ll likely choose the one that supports the project.

Simply changing the search to Yahoo will not explain to the user that it is a revenue sharing deal that will benefit the project. It will be an annoyance for those that prefer Google, their previous choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, it is two clicks to change it after annoying the end user.</p>
<p>With my suggestion it is one click, explains to the user why one selection would help the Ubuntu project and allow the user to make a choice. For those that don&#8217;t care about the particular search engine they&#8217;ll likely choose the one that supports the project.</p>
<p>Simply changing the search to Yahoo will not explain to the user that it is a revenue sharing deal that will benefit the project. It will be an annoyance for those that prefer Google, their previous choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forced Changes In My Browser by Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/?p=179#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I do not like Yahoo because it is powered by Microsoft&#039;s Bing. 

However, I do support this strategic move if it gives some revenue which then can be funnelled into Linux. 

Sometimes one has to give little in order to move forward, but never lose site of the goal. This is what Canonical is doing. I consider it a smart, yet bold move which is sure to rub some Linux users the wrong way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not like Yahoo because it is powered by Microsoft&#8217;s Bing. </p>
<p>However, I do support this strategic move if it gives some revenue which then can be funnelled into Linux. </p>
<p>Sometimes one has to give little in order to move forward, but never lose site of the goal. This is what Canonical is doing. I consider it a smart, yet bold move which is sure to rub some Linux users the wrong way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
